Jesu dulcis memoria (Estêvão de Brito): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Original text and translations: LnkTxt) |
(→Music files: Replaced score info by template and completed) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*'''CPDL #186:''' [{{SERVER}}/wiki/images/sheet/iri-jesu.pdf {{pdf}}] [{{SERVER}}/wiki/images/sound/iri-jesu.mid {{mid}}] [{{SERVER}}/wiki/images/source/iri-jesu.zip Encore] | *'''CPDL #186:''' [{{SERVER}}/wiki/images/sheet/iri-jesu.pdf {{pdf}}] [{{SERVER}}/wiki/images/sound/iri-jesu.mid {{mid}}] [{{SERVER}}/wiki/images/source/iri-jesu.zip Encore] | ||
{{Editor|2|Paco Marmol|Manolo Casaus|1999-10-14}} | {{Editor|2|Paco Marmol|Manolo Casaus|1999-10-14}}{{ScoreInfo|A4|1|22}}{{Copy|CPDL}} | ||
:'''Edition notes:''' wrongly attributed to Juan Frances de Iribarren. See [[Juan Frances de Iribarren]] for another edition.<br> | :'''Edition notes:''' wrongly attributed to Juan Frances de Iribarren. See [[Juan Frances de Iribarren]] for another edition.<br> | ||
{{ScoreError|The same comment as for 'Stabat Mater': It seems more likely that the attribution to de Brito (1570-1641) is mistaken. Iribarren's dates were 1698-1767, and the style of this work does not look earlier than that, nor does it resemble the works by de Brito that I know. Portuguese polyphony was extremely conservative in de Brito's day, and typical works by him are in a style which, to us, looks more 16th century than 17th, let alone 18th. Be that as it may, the tenor part should certainly sound an octave higher than shown in this score. - Mick Swithinbank}} | {{ScoreError|The same comment as for 'Stabat Mater': It seems more likely that the attribution to de Brito (1570-1641) is mistaken. Iribarren's dates were 1698-1767, and the style of this work does not look earlier than that, nor does it resemble the works by de Brito that I know. Portuguese polyphony was extremely conservative in de Brito's day, and typical works by him are in a style which, to us, looks more 16th century than 17th, let alone 18th. Be that as it may, the tenor part should certainly sound an octave higher than shown in this score. - Mick Swithinbank}} | ||
Revision as of 09:05, 1 December 2010
Music files
|
| See notes for details and correct composer below or see the discussion page. |
| ICON | SOURCE |
|---|---|
 |
File details |
 |
Help |
- CPDL #186:
Encore
- Editors: Paco Marmol and Manolo Casaus (submitted 1999-10-14). Score information: A4, 1 page, 22 kB Copyright: CPDL
- Edition notes: wrongly attributed to Juan Frances de Iribarren. See Juan Frances de Iribarren for another edition.
Possible error(s) identified. Error summary: The same comment as for 'Stabat Mater': It seems more likely that the attribution to de Brito (1570-1641) is mistaken. Iribarren's dates were 1698-1767, and the style of this work does not look earlier than that, nor does it resemble the works by de Brito that I know. Portuguese polyphony was extremely conservative in de Brito's day, and typical works by him are in a style which, to us, looks more 16th century than 17th, let alone 18th. Be that as it may, the tenor part should certainly sound an octave higher than shown in this score. - Mick Swithinbank See the discussion page for full description.
General Information
Title: Jesu dulcis memoria
Composer: Estêvão de Brito
Number of voices: 4vv Voicing: SATB
Genre: Sacred, [[]]
Language: Latin
Instruments:
Published:
Description:
External websites:
Original text and translations
Original text and translations may be found at Jesu dulcis memoria.